Archives
Oct 14, 2009
2009-10 Season Preview: Milwaukee Bucks

Jun 12, 2009
30 Teams, 30 Days: Milwaukee Draft Preview

Feb 24, 2009
Myrtle Beach's Best

Nov 24, 2008
Demanding Attention

May 29, 2008
Auditing The Bucks 2007-08 Season

Full Archive

The Bucks Blew It Big Time With Magloire Trade
Authored by Patrick J. Austin - July 31, 2006 - 10:48 pm



Current Featured Columns
Merry Christmas, Raptors Fans
The Raptors might not be playing good basketball right now, but there are plenty of things for Toronto fans to be thankful for this holiday season.

A Melo Behind The Superstars
Carmelo Anthony has never been one of the league's most efficient offensive players.

Maynor Using Utah’s Resources
Eric Maynor is an increasingly rare four-year, small college rookie. He sat down with RealGM to discuss how his first few weeks of NBA life has gone and what he has learned from Deron Williams and Jerry Sloan.
Why LeBron To The Clippers Makes Sense
LeBron James already plays for a perennial underdog in Cleveland, but moving to the Clippers would allow him to do so in a huge market and with a core that will immediately compete for championships while also having an encouraging long term outlook.
‘Home-Heavy Schedule’ Brings Question Marks
The Heat have been plagued by inconsistencies, making it difficult to determine how good they really are this season.
More from RealGM's Columnists

RealGM Search
Search:
After months of speculation, the Milwaukee Bucks officially dealt center, Jamaal Magloire. What did the Bucks get in return for their starting center? Well, not very much; essentially a trio of role players in Steve Blake, Brian Skinner, and Ha Seung-Jin. I’m sure most Bucks fans are thinking, “Wow, this is a terrible deal.” You know what, they’re absolutely right.

The Bucks gave away one of the few productive centers in the league for peanuts. Don’t get me wrong, Steve Blake is a solid backup point guard, Brian Skinner is a workhorse, and Ha Seung-Jin has the upside to turn into a decent second unit center. However, this collection of “talent” does not equate to a center like Magloire. Yes, Magloire had a disappointing season (9.2ppg & 9.5rpg) and is set to become an unrestricted free agent next summer, but you have to get more than three role players for a 28-year old, starting caliber center. It’s common knowledge that size is treasured in the NBA and yet the Bucks dealt this valuable trade commodity for pennies on the dollar.

It’s shocking how quickly a player’s value can drop after just one less-than-stellar season. The Bucks gave up Desmond Mason and their 2006 first round pick, which wound up being the fifteenth selection (Cedric Simmons), in order to land Magloire. That was a heck of alot, especially when you compare it to what the Bucks got in return for Maggs.

Why did they get so little in turn for Jamaal? To be honest, I think the blame falls solely on the shoulders of their General Manager, Larry Harris. He broke the cardinal rule when it comes to shopping a player – he let everyone know his player was readily available and needed to be moved sooner rather than later. The moment Harris declared publicly that Magloire was on the block, Jamaal’s trade value dropped substantially. Why? Because other General Manager’s realized they wouldn’t have to offer maximum value in order to land Magloire. It’s simple business logic – you don’t pay $100 for a product if you know you can acquire it for $50.

Harris should have gone to all the newspapers and media outlets proclaiming Magloire’s value to the team and how talented the big man is. He should have created a mystique of greatness around Magloire and then started up trade discussions. If he had done that, I guarantee you he could have gotten much more than three bench players.

Steve Blake is the only player they received who is capable of doing anything of significance for the team, but even he will be challenged to get playing time with Charlie Bell and Mo Williams at point guard. The only impact Brian Skinner and Ha Seung-Jin will make is keeping the bench warm. Honestly, I can’t see either beating out Charlie Villanueva, Andrew Bogut, Joe Smith, and Dan Gadzuric for playing time at the 4/5 positions.

Larry Harris had an opportunity to really improve the roster by trading Magloire for a player of need or even some first round draft picks. Instead, he traded him for three guys who will probably make a minimal impact. The entire Magloire in Milwaukee experience is a perfect example of what not to do if you’re an NBA General Manager.

You should never acquire a player for high value (i.e. Mason/1st rounder) and trade him for low value (i.e. the aforementioned bench trio). I don’t think anyone can say the Bucks are a better team after this trade.